{"id":1096,"date":"2013-08-23T12:39:01","date_gmt":"2013-08-23T02:39:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/reckoner.com.au\/?p=1096"},"modified":"2013-08-27T20:18:49","modified_gmt":"2013-08-27T10:18:49","slug":"adding-to-yesterdays-iphone-analysis","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/reckoner.com.au\/features\/adding-to-yesterdays-iphone-analysis\/","title":{"rendered":"Adding to yesterday’s iPhone analysis"},"content":{"rendered":"

Since posting yesterday, I’ve had some great feedback & comments refining my proposed projections for Apple’s new iPhones. So I wanted to take the time today to break some of those down and refine my ideas further.<\/p>\n

Reader Tom Izaks<\/a> pointed to news earlier in Feburary of Qualcomm (Apple’s cellular chipset maker) working on a yet-unreleased ‘global LTE chip’<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Qualcomm said OEM products (that is, smartphones) containing its new chipset will launch in the second half of this year.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Apple Insider<\/a> also had news on the technical specs of this purported chipset:<\/p>\n

The RF360 chipset is “designed to mitigate this problem while improving RF performance,” and offers support for all seven cellular modes, including LTE-FDD, LTE-TDD, WCDMA, EV-DO, CDMA 1x, TD-SCDMA and GSM\/EDGE.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

This would definitely make sense to be incorporated into a next-gen iPhone, given this chipset would also support China Mobile’s TD-SCDMA network, one of the biggest growth markets for Apple.<\/p>\n

This would dramatically simplify their lineup, cutting the number of variations to 1\/3 of what it was before. It would also eliminate the possibility of a 3G-only iPhone 5C. I think this is entirely feasible.<\/p>\n

Second, some readers suggested a 128GB iPhone 5S may be possibility. I find it hard to fathom, given the push to cloud-enabled services & streaming, but I can’t rule it out. I can’t see Apple doing 4 different levels of storage, so a 128GB iPhone would also naturally eliminate the baseline version at 16GB. That’s a tough call to make.<\/p>\n

Based on this info, let’s re-examine my original predictions:<\/p>\n